Sunday, March 21, 2010

Falsifiable Evidence: A continuing story of apostasy.

Falsifiable Evidence: A continuing story of apostasy.

I’ve been asked what made me give up faith. What was the first thing that took me from the religious faith to the atheist reason I have today. How did it all begin? I’ve posted portions of my journey to apostasy in my blog, but I’ve never addressed this question.

When I was a senior in high school (remember I attended a private Catholic high school), I started having questions about what I believed and why. I thought I’d just missed something in my religious classes, so I began to attend extra classes outside my regular schooling. Here, I learned about the order of angels, the levels of hell, and other bits of catholic dogma. One evening, the topic turned to abortion and birth control. At the time, I was the most pro-life, anti-abortion person I knew, second only to my mother.

The instructor made a fatal error: he made a statement that I could research myself. You see, I cannot refute the order of angels. I cannot find evidence of the levels of hell. There is no way to discover these things, as they are not based on evidence but faith. But then I learned, “The earth is NOT overpopulated. In fact, the entire population of the earth could fit into the state of Texas and have an acre per person!!”

See, now I can research this. I can find the population of the earth is and I can find the size of Texas. I can do the math and find this is WRONG!! I’ll not do it for you; do it yourself and see what answer you reach. Before you do, though, let me finish what I was learning.

The instructor, if you can call him that, got his information from the Population Research Institute. Check out the founder and see how this came up in a Catholic class. Notice the agenda. This was clearly spelled out in the class I attended. We must be clear that overpopulation is a myth, and we have a responsibility to reproduce as many children as god (not us) sees fit.

Once I realized the only bit if falsifiable information I had ever gained from a catholic class was in fact false, I had a hard time swallowing the rest. If someone was willing to lie to be about facts I could research, what was to stop them from lying about “facts” I could not? How can I be sure ANYTHING I had been taught about my religion was not instead a part of another agenda? Could I see how a story might have been constructed simply to further an ulterior agenda? I mean, today I have the means to research and validate claims. In the time the bible was written the internet did not exist. I know the gospels were not written by actual eyewitnesses, so what stopped them from lying? Of course, they had Paul’s writings from which they could concoct a story, and if each wrote a gospel to further a separate ulterior agenda, the differences among them would make perfect sense. See, I HAD been paying attention in a few classes.

So, what have you found in your research of the world’s population and the size of Texas? I went to www.wikipedia.com for all my data. The population is roughly 6.8 billion (6,800,000,000). The area of Texas is 286,820 sq mi. A square mile is the equivalent of 640 acres. So:
286,820 sq mi X 640 acres/sq mi = 183,564,800 acres

183,564,800 acres / 6,800,000,000 people = 0.027 acres/person.

I guess it’s not bad for people who think pi = 3.

Friday, March 5, 2010

The Temptation of Heaven

Heaven, the greatest carrot and stick routine

I was reading a muslim’s blog the other day. This particular blog was talking about how non-muslims seem to be fascinated by the 70 virgins in heaven thing. I must say that when the writer said that this is the first thing most non-muslims think of islam, I agreed. This seems to be true for me. The point of this particular blog was that the point of the virgins isn’t the virgins themselves, but that heaven is a reward for those who chose the right religion (or were lucky enough to have been born in it) and followed the dogma of the religion all their life. I would say that my problem with the virgins is not the virgins themselves, but the fact religion thinks we need a reward in order to do the right thing.

Let me start with this: what IS the right thing to do? How do we tell the right from wrong? The question of right and wrong SHOULD keep us up at night. We should constantly be pondering our personal code of morals and ethics, looking for flaws and ways to correct those flaws. We need to be able to discuss what we find with those closest to us, to get other perspectives and weigh them. But this can only happen AFTER we accept that there are no objective moral standards, and that any moral standard we make can be wrong. If we think our morality is the best, greatest morality that has god’s stamp of approval, I imagine you’d have no reason to ever ask if an action is or is not right. And you’d have no reason to change it. And your morality would surly stagnate, and fail. Humans are fallible, but we are the ones in control of our morality. Give it over to an imaginary god, and we have lost before we have begun.

Of course religion is no place to find moral standards. If it were, we’d see all religions agreeing on what is right and what is wrong. And while simple layers like the Golden Rule do seem to make multiple appearances, how this plays out certainly varies from religion to religion. Show me a religion that says “…and play nice with other religions, for they have as much evidence of their god(s) as you do”.

And why should we do the right thing instead of the wrong thing? Perhaps the wrong thing is easier, more profitable, or more enjoyable. Why would anyone ever choose to do the right thing if the wrong thing could bring about a better result? Surely we can all agree that the right thing often is far more complicated that the wring thing. Surely we have all been faced with a choice where the wrong thing would bring a more favorable outcome. Why do you not do it? Never do I weigh the consequences that I may face in an afterlife when making this decision. Yet I am pulled to do the right thing, because I know it is the right thing to do. Is there any reward better than knowing you did your best?

In a story I often read to my son at bedtime, a boy is faced with the problem of showing an empty pot to the emperor, when he knows all the other children will be presenting lovely flowers. His father says to him, “You did your best, and your best is good enough to present to the emperor.” I love that line.

Now don’t get me wrong. I like rewards. I have a Kroger card: I save my Coke caps; I used to save Camel cash before some asshat thought the free lighters were the reason I smoked. But the thing is I shop at Kroger because it’s close to my house. I like soda, and Coke is my favorite. Nicotine is addictive. In other words, I’d do these things without the rewards. I ought to be able to do the right thing without one either.

Finally, let’s talk about the nature of the reward. In heaven, or at least the muslim heaven described in the blog, you get all the pleasures of earth without any consequence. You can eat and never be full or gain weight. You can have sex with your 70 virgins and they will remain virgins. You can drink and never be drunk. You get the idea. You know, to me, this sounds more like hell than heaven.

What would I ever do with 70 virgins? Like I’m dead so I have all the time in eternity to teach them all what to do? Why can’t heaven have one chick who knows how to do the dirty dance with me? I find one person who has a clue is better then 100 giggling at each other.

Look, after I’m dead, I don’t want to eat to enjoy the taste of food. I don’t want to have sex for pleasure. I don’t want to drink alcohol and get intoxicated. THAT’S WHAT LIFE IS FOR!! If I didn’t do those things while I was alive, why would I think a good time to start is after I’m dead? As if a virgin, on his/her deathbed ever thought, “Gee, I’m going to die and finally lose my virginity after I’m in heaven!” I doubt it.

I can’t understand why we can’t enjoy a good pork chop today, while we are alive. I’m confused why we should not have sex now, while we can. Why is alcohol banned in this life and not in the next? Why would I EVER want to drink alcohol and NOT get drunk?

Religion tries to tempt me with promises of eternal pleasure once I’m dead if I follow the “rules” in life. Like an eternal hand job. I guess I just know how to resist temptation. Besides, I don’t need god to give me a hand job. I can do that myself just fine.